Termites & Consciousness{?}
by paco on Sunday, March 7th, 2010 | 25 Comments
do not try to xplain it with the superstitions of Lamarck. u need to xplain it by your miserable brainless mutations. let’s do it honestly!

Insect killer and garden pest tips.
do not try to xplain it with the superstitions of Lamarck. u need to xplain it by your miserable brainless mutations. let’s do it honestly!

It does not counter what I was saying at all!. I do not profess to have an intuitive knowledge of how termites or ant colonies work, neither does anyone else!. These studies take 20 or more years and are conducted in a very exacting and specific manor!> We simply need more time, but what we have been able to determine so far is fascinating!. Go to ted talks director on here and find the ant video it blew my mind!.
but to counter what your saying scientists have noticed that termites are able to react to dangers far to fast for it to be them comuacting just by smell alone
Sir, the point is that evolution insists on life coming from a dead matter. Yes, over billions of years…It rained down on rocks and soup of chemicals…Then through a super-duper-complicated process….The first self-duplicating living cell appeared. How? They don’t know.
Pathetic.
It is now known that Ants and termites (and probably lots of other creatures)( use smell to coordinate their efforts!. As an insect basses another, it ribs a leg onto a passing insect. On the leg is residue from where it has been giving the insect a notion of what is going on and what it is to do!.
It is your complete lack of knowledge in the subject you’re talking about which implies that you don’t read, it has little to do with theism or atheism. Your claims are once again reductionistic and have no bearing on reality. Educate cyourself, and if you’re going to refute evolution, at least try to provide some valid arguments (which is highly difficult since there are none). Quit denying a direct observation.
so for billions of years,a “not really cell yet” cell waited,tried and tried waited and waited
then the miracle happened
and the next trillions of miracles were not really difficult to come into…
and where do u know i didnt read?
lemme guess,only atheists read,right
loz
It’s not like cells just randomly appeared from chemicals just like that. It was a long and drawn out process spanning a couple billion years – which hwen you look at it in terms of chemistry is alot of time for the process of nature to establish life in step by step increments. Your question is highly reductionistic and indicates your ignorance on the subject. Read a bit, then come back and make some valid claims. AND Just because we don’t have an explanation does not prove God by default.
HINT:
Beginning and ending a statement with “lol” only makes you look insecure.
i seriously doubt that anyone “that isn’t completely mad” is LOL’ng at how brilliantly they’re doing in the great termite debate of 08.
lets see it requires a specific amount of elements and then energy, such as a huge lightning, to create a small cell like creature, that creature must then find some sort of food before it dies, and thus life is born. (or atleast, thats A theory.
lol
sky-daddy
ur best argument against your Creator
first explain how life “arises” from matter
lol
lol
take ur years
btw,in some of them,try to prove,how life “can arise” from inanimate matter
lol
You sir, are a moron.
Oh, and we do know that termites communicate via smells…what we don’t know (yet) is how that process works. Give us a few more years and we’ll figure that out too.
“By God”? lol
Talk about an act of arrogance…assuming you know what the infinite is thinking/doing.
That is a flawed way of thinking…making the assumption first and then spinning random facts to meet that assumption. That is not the scientific method and not good thinking.
WHAT?! David Attenborough, whom this was taken from, is an atheist. Look up HIS opinions on God.
Science hasn’t explained everything, it’s OKAY to not KNOW.
There are many mysteries to be solved. Just because we haven’t explained it does not provide proof to some all-powerful sky daddy.
Termites’ biomass outweighs ours and yet they’re able to coexist with the planet. Don’t lose the message: We have never built something to the scale that these insects have.
What if you don’t believe in god??=4= c’mon, use your long abandoned brain a bit. If someone don’t believe in god, one will never agree with this “ghost and angry holy spirit” crap.
grow up kev
your just an non believing nutter that gets off on being nastie
clearly your an evil loon y tunist
i thought you guys liked comming from or with monkeys
who cares or need you to came anywhere
god cares
i know miss spelling words makes it
imposasable for you to coimprehensd must we chew your food for you as well
Wow, I was a baboon…what an insult! I’ll come to Jesus now! In truth, Im not sure what a “spitit” is but What I have belongs to me, not some imaginary ego maniacal sky tyrant.
when you die you get your just reward, we all do ,death is just a change of body,our spitit belongs to god, thus like god is eternal,
an ant dies much depends on what it learned in its life
we as man incarnations have spiritually evolved into man
but many man are still of the beast nature from thier previous incarnation
Holy fuck, what a stupid video. If termites are inspired by god, does that mean the Aardvark or Anteater that eats them is inspired by Satan? The fact that termites behave differently in different locations shows how evolution is an adaptive process based on local resources and threats. The video insists humans “Cannot” know what motivates termites. This is retarded. Because we don’t know doesn’t mean “unknowable.” Pathetic.
people who deney science are fools
science that deneys god is foolishness
there is one who knows all god
he in his wisdom has given some parts of the whole to each of us
he sent to each nation a prophet
in thier own tongue
it is not untill we all come together with love and grace that men can even begin to see the all and wisdom of that one living, loving , mercyfull ans all knowing we know simply know as god’good
ummm thanks for doing the work for me,IRC is a creationist arguement not an ‘evolutionist’ one
falsafiablity means quite simply that there is a resualt, if it occures, that will show the hypothesis false. something being not falsafiable means that there is no resualt which will prove it false.
i shal,l disprove irriducable complexity
i shall remove half of the debate
you will yet continue the debate
or chose not to respond ]
either way half has been decomplexity yet the debate went on
not till both were extinct did irc have any validity
thus this half of the debate was reduced
simple isnt it?
one hand talking
irc ,not only redifined rebutted
now you can prove it
by your self
likewise you are presistant in denying evidence. i don’t have the forcefulness to convince you, and you don’t have the wit to convince me. therfore all points are meaningless.